Dissecting A Circle 


My lastest posts can be found here: Previous blog posts:
Additionally, some earlier writings: 
Dissecting a Circle  2011/07/26
What about the other possibilities? I was first presented with this as a puzzle over dinner after one meeting of the Liverpool Mathematical Society in 2009. I solved it in a minute or so, and everyone was very impressed. As it happens, though, I now know several people who have solved it almost instantly  sub 5 minutes. Most interestingly, we all have the same, very odd "thing" (call it "Factor X") in our backgrounds, and anyone without "Factor X" takes a long time to solve the puzzle. Having worked that out, I'm much more impressed by those without "Factor X" who have solved it  that seems much more difficult. And no, I'm not going to say what "Factor X" is  that would be too much of a hint. So anyway, I presented my solution, and conversation moved on. To me there was an air of inevitability about the solution, and I didn't think too much more about it. Until I was told, a few weeks later, that a group of school kids had got a different solution. I was gobsmacked. I felt that the solution I'd found was probably the only way to do it, and to find that there was another was, to say the least, really surprising. But wait, there was more to come. The other solution was actually one of an infinite family of solutions. And even more, there were solutions for each number from 2 onwards. And even more than that, the number of solutions at each level (as it were) grew explosively. So we had a rapidly rapidly growing infinite family of solutions. And then there was mine (or at least, the one I'd found). Surely that was all. But no, Joel Haddley found yet another solution, and when we worked on that we realised we had another infinite family. This one was "better behaved" in that there was just one for each odd number from 3 onwards, but now we had two infinite families. And the original sporadic. A moment of insight then revealed that the socalled "sporadic" was, in fact, a degenerate case of the second infinite family. So we had two infinite families, one "linear," and one that grows explosively as you get further along. And that's where we are. Joel continues to work on it, and may have a proof that we've got them all. But I wondered, maybe the square problem wasn't so simple after all. And it isn't.
Commentsblog comments powered by Disqus

Contents 
Links on this page


Quotation from Tim BernersLee 