<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.solipsys.co.uk/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="https://www.solipsys.co.uk/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<title>Random Ramblings on Math, Juggling, Programming, Business, and stuff ...</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ColinsBlog.html</link>
<description>Although titled "blog", this is more just random rants and streams
of consciousness, touching on math, juggling, programming, user interaction,
business, and anything that comes to mind.  Read at your peril!</description>

<item>
<title>Tesseract Teaser</title>
<link>http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TesseractTeaser.html?RSS</link>
<guid>http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TesseractTeaser.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
Not the four-dimensional cube sort of Tesseract, this is the
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) "Tesseract", software that
takes an image of some lettering and produces a plain text
file containing the text.  Or not.  It's well-known that this
is "Actually Quite Hard(tm)" and Tesseract does a pretty good
job "Out of the Box" with very little messing about.  But the
other day I ran across something that has me utterly baffled.
Let me share my bebafflement with you. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>More Mental Model Missteps</title>
<link>http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MoreMentalModelMissteps.html?RSS</link>
<guid>http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MoreMentalModelMissteps.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
I mentioned when talking about an oddity in vim that the behaviour
of the command "&lt;n&gt;J" didn't match my mental model.  Sometimes
software does that, it had behaviour that's totally reasonable when
you think about it one way, but there's another way of thinking that
causes you to be surprised.  Here's another, as reported to me by a
friend.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>An Oddity In VIM</title>
<link>http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnOddityInVIM.html?RSS</link>
<guid>http://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnOddityInVIM.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
I'm going to tell you a story, so this is quite a long post.  If
you'd like to skip the story get directly to the main point then
feel free to do so.  But if you're interested in the story, make
sure you're sitting comfortably, and I'll tell you how I found an
oddity in /vim./
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Double Double Division Algorithm</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DoubleDoubleDivisionAlgorithm.html?RSS</link>
<guid>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DoubleDoubleDivisionAlgorithm.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
For some of my readers, this will all be completely mysterious.
But for others, part way through they will go "I recognise this!"
So I'd really like to hear from you ... if you recognise this,
at which point did the penny drop?  I'd also really like to know
if you think this is obvious, and possibly even if you've seen
it before.

Consider the following algorithm.  I'll work through an example.
I'll divide 450 by 23.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Continuity Concerns</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ContinuityConcerns.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ContinuityConcerns.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2021 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
Recently, Rachel and I have been watching the episodes of
"The Adventures of Paddington Bear" that have been transmitted on
broadcast TV here in the UK.  It's not exactly gentle viewing, but
Paddington is kind, helpful (or tries to be), and it always turns
out well.  Not very realistic, but if you watch with the right
attitude, it is uplifting.  Judge us if you will - we don't care.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Counting Carbon Calories</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/CountingCarbonCalories.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/CountingCarbonCalories.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
"When you lose weight, where does it go?"
An interesting question, and one where most people haven't thought
about it, don't know, and really don't care.  But when I was asked,
it set in motion a train of thought.  Follow along, and see if it
makes sense.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Parity Of Zero</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheParityOfZero.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheParityOfZero.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
Before you react to the title, and before you guess where this
is going and form a reaction, pause.  I might not be about to
say what you expect.  Of course, I might, but I might not, and
I'd ask you to wait a bit.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>When The Text And HTML Disagree</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhenTheTextAndHtmlDisagree.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhenTheTextAndHtmlDisagree.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
Second Saturday of the month, and that means the Farmers' Market is
on. Even in this second lockdown it will be running, with a one-way
system and limited numbers permitted inside at any one time.  
But is it at the usual time? Let's check the email.
Oh, I seem to have deleted it. Never mind, there will be a backup ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Recursion Revisited</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RecursionRevisited.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RecursionRevisited.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago I wrote a post on Thinking About Recursion, and
more recently I wrote about a problem concerning the problem
of the number of Vertices Required For Cycles. As it happens,
the code for that problem is heavily recursive, and provides
a great example of using recursion to solve a real problem.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Vertices Required For Cycles</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/VerticesRequiredForCycles.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/VerticesRequiredForCycles.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
A few weeks ago Chris Purcell (@ccppurcell@mathstodon.xyz) said:
Let a_n be the size of the smallest graph with exactly n cycles.
(The first few terms are: 3, 5, 4, 6, ...)  The first few values
are easy enough to compute, but it gets quite tricky quite quickly.
How can one construct a (simple undirected) graph with exactly
5 cycles?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Reflex Actions</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ReflexActions.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ReflexActions.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
The machine wouldn't read my credit card.
That's not uncommon ... sometimes the contacts on my card
are dirty, sometimes the contacts on the machine are dirty
... no big deal. Just lick your thumb, rub the contacts,
and try again. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Ballad Of Bunter</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheBalladOfBunter.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheBalladOfBunter.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
In late May it was becoming increasingly clear that Rachel's laptop
was increasingly eccentric.  A replacement would be needed, and while
it wasn't yet urgent, we felt we should do something before it became
so.  And so the hunt began.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Infinite Ramsey Theorem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/InfiniteRamseyTheorem.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/InfiniteRamseyTheorem.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
With the passing of Ron Graham a few people have been in touch
with me to ask what "Ramsey Theory" is.  So I've given a brief
outline, and pointers in case people want to follow up.  In
truth, just stick "Ramsey Theory" into your favourite search
engine and you'll get lots to follow up and chase down (as
opposed, of course, to "follow down" or "chase up").
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Signal Reflection</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SignalReflection.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SignalReflection.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Way back in the 70s when I was building logic circuits, I was
warned repeatedly that I'd have to get a few things right, or
risk "locking up" or "burning out" the CMOS chips I was using.
The bogeyman was "Signal Reflection", but no one could tell me
what it was, or why it was so bad.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Analogies Not Considered Harmful</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnalogiesNotConsideredHarmful.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnalogiesNotConsideredHarmful.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
While I was writing my post on SignalReflection, I was given cause
to reflect (pun intended ... sorry) on exactly the role and value
of analogies in science, maths, and life in general.  I've come to
the conclusion that, like so many thing, analogies are neither good
nor bad.  They have their purpose, and each lies somewhere on a
spectrum.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Twitter Reply vs Quote Tweet</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TwitterReplyVsQuoteTweet.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TwitterReplyVsQuoteTweet.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
More than once now I've seen someone on social media using an
option which has, for their purposes, been sub-optimal.  In one
case it led to a very unpleasant exchange, purely because one
person assumed an implication that simply wasn't intended.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Proofs To Make You Go WOW</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ProofsToMakeYouGoWOW.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ProofsToMakeYouGoWOW.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
For those of us who love maths, it's sad to see how many people
hate it, or have a phobia of it, or proudly announce "I was never
very good at maths at school."  The question we often counter with
is "Would you be so proud of being unable to read?"
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Laptop Purchase Advice Received</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LaptopPurchaseAdviceReceived.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LaptopPurchaseAdviceReceived.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Rachel's laptop has become ... eccentric. Like a toddler, or an aging
relative, who won't get up in the morning, won't go to bed at night,
and won't play nicely with others, I'm afraid The Admirable Crichton
has taken to not starting up properly, not shutting down properly, and
occasionally just refusing to connect either over ethernet, or Wi-Fi.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Blow Up Your Ability Balloon</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BlowUpYourAbilityBalloon.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BlowUpYourAbilityBalloon.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
It's pretty clear to most of us that skills unpractised are
eventually lost.  Anything at the limits of our abilities
need to be exercised regularly to avoid having them waste
away.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Factlet For All</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AFactletForAll.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AFactletForAll.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
More and more often I hear people saying and see people writing
"factoid", by which they mean "A Small Fact".  But is that right?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Anatomy of a Hit</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnatomyOfAHit.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnatomyOfAHit.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I was *very* surprised when a post got significant traction
on a forum I visit, and I set up some tracking to see what happened
... this is the report.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sell Yourself, Sell Your Work</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SellYourselfSellYourWork.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SellYourselfSellYourWork.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Doing technically brilliant work may be enough for your
personal gratification, but you should never think it's
enough.  If you lock yourself in a room and do the most
marvellous work but don't tell anyone, then no one will
know, no one will benefit, and the work will be lost. You
may as well not have bothered. For the world to benefit
from your work, and therefore for you to benefit fully
from your work, you have to make it known.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>All The Letters</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AllTheLetters.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AllTheLetters.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Most people are aware of the phrase: "The quick brown fox
jumped over the lazy dog."  But many, perhaps most, don't
realise (a) Why it's interesting, and (b) It's wrong.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Being Slow To Criticise</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BeingSlowToCriticise.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BeingSlowToCriticise.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Software that deliberately kills the servers it is monitoring is
an interesting idea. A story I read recently told of a situation
where the programmer and/or engineer involved wasn't able to fix
the real, underlying problem, so an overlay solution was devised
that (a) worked, and (b) was feasible.  This post is not about
that story. This post is about a comment made by one of the readers
in the forum where I saw it.  
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>State Machine In Real Life</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/StateMachineInRealLife.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/StateMachineInRealLife.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
In April 2016 my wife and I were travelling.  We stayed in a
reasonably comfortable but very inexpensive hotel, and meals
weren't provided. As it happened, across the way was a large
retail park with a large well-known supermarket chain, and
they had a restaurant. We ate there four or five times, and
I noticed that they were using a finite state machine.  
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Coxeter Once Nerd-Sniped Conway</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/CoxeterOnceNerdSnipedConway.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/CoxeterOnceNerdSnipedConway.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I wrote earlier about John Conway's passing and some of my memories
of him.  I also mentioned there how he was once nerd-sniped by Coxeter.
John didn't call it "nerd sniping" - he didn't know the term - but when
I explained it, he was delighted, as it exactly matched his experience.
So here is the story, as told to me by Conway at MathFest, 2015 ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not Always Your Fault</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NotAlwaysYourFault.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NotAlwaysYourFault.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
"I must have done something wrong." I hear this a lot when people
are using computer interfaces.  These days that's often websites,
often for large corporations, and often trying to accomplish
something one feels should be simple. And yet in all honesty,
it's not always your fault.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Remembering Conway</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RememberingConway.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RememberingConway.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
John Conway has left us.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Perception of Space</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PerceptionOfSpace.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PerceptionOfSpace.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
During this time of lockdown and/or self-isolation, it's
tempting for those of us content with our own company to
sit tight indoors and wait it out.  But I'm reminding of
some stories told to me by my friend Laurie Brokenshire.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Parallelogram Puzzle</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ParallelogramPuzzle.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ParallelogramPuzzle.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
A while ago Ed Southall asked a great question on Twitter about
joining dots to make a parallelogram.  Several people chimed in
quite quickly, others took a little longer.  Some were happy to
have found any solution at all, others were happy to have found
two solutions, and then quite a few people started to claim that
there were, in fact, exactly two solutions.  That made me wonder
...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Back Of The Envelope COVID19</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BackOfTheEnvelopeCOVID19.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BackOfTheEnvelopeCOVID19.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I did a rough "Back of the Envelope" calculation about
COVID-19.  Here are my rough-and-ready results.  
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Point Against The Axiom Of Choice</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/APointAgainstTheAxiomOfChoice.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/APointAgainstTheAxiomOfChoice.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Last time we saw that the Axiom Of Choice seems so reasonable.
It's basically saying that that the product of non-empty sets
is always non-empty, and that seems obvious.  But in this post
we look at one of the implications of accepting the Axiom Of
Choice, and wonder if perhaps it's not so obvious after all. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>In Defense Of The Axiom Of Choice</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/InDefenseOfTheAxiomOfChoice.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/InDefenseOfTheAxiomOfChoice.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
The first of a two-parter, here we provide a reason to accept
that the Axiom of Choice is reasonable, and should be used.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Journeying Home Through Storm Dennis</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/JourneyingHomeThroughStormDennis.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/JourneyingHomeThroughStormDennis.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Saturday, Feb 15th, 2020, and I'd delivered a Maths Masterclass
just north of Cardiff in South Wales. I'd packed my things and
was offered a lift to the station, which was gratefully accepted.
It was raining, although not torrentially, but Storm Dennis was
due to hit, and we were feeling the initial effects.  This is
the story of what happened next ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Earth Radius - Refined</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/EarthRadiusRefined.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/EarthRadiusRefined.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Previously we looked at computing the radius of the Earth
by watching the Sun coming down a building at sunrise, but
there's been some question about the answer, so now let's
do it "properly".
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Volume Of A Sphere</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/VolumeOfASphere.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/VolumeOfASphere.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Fermat's Library on Twitter tweeted "Euler presented in his textbooks
the exact formula for the volume of a sphere" and there followed an
image with the actual formula.  Over 12 thousand people "Liked" the
tweet, but someone said: "How would you go about proving this one?"
So here is how we can prove it. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Big-Oh and Relations</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BigOhAndRelations.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BigOhAndRelations.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
In an earlier post we saw that the function f(n)=n dominates
g(n)=n-ln(n), but that's no surprise.  What does come as a
surprise is that g dominates f. So even though for any value
of n greater than 2 we already have f(n)>g(n), still we say
that g dominates f.  That feels *very* unexpected, and as
a result you might question the value of the concept of
"dominates", so we'll pause and take a moment to see if we
can get a handle on what's going on.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Mathematical Relations</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MathematicalRelations.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MathematicalRelations.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
Ubiquitous in mathematics is the concept of comparing things,
and examining the relationships between them. Since we do that
all the time and everywhere, it's worth having a look at the
concept of a "Relation" in an abstract sense to try to tease
out the common themes.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Introducing Big-Oh</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IntroducingBigOh.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IntroducingBigOh.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2019 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
<description>
Last time I said: "If you do this for two different algorithms and
the results are, apart from a scaling factor, pretty much the same,
then the algorithms are said to have the same 'Time Complexity'."
Now we'll look at that more carefully.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Constant Differences</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ConstantDifferences.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ConstantDifferences.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
It's time to get our hands dirty.  In this post we look carefully at
a particular algorithm, and think hard about how long it takes for a
given instance.  From that we find an important concept emerging.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Algorithms and Sizes of Instances</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AlgorithmsAndSizesOfInstances.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AlgorithmsAndSizesOfInstances.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
We've looked at what we mean by a "Problem", and by an "Instance" of
a problem. For each challenge, we need a way of working out what the
response should be.  Such a method is called an "Algorithm" for that
problem, so let's think carefully about algorithms. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Introducing Time Complexity</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IntroducingTimeComplexity.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IntroducingTimeComplexity.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I discovered that a friend of mine, an outstandingly
good mathematician, didn't know anything about how the whole
"Time Complexity" thing worked, and didn't understand about
$P$ versus $NP$ and similar concepts.  So here is an outline
of the ideas in what I hope will be bite-sized, accessible
chunks.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Linear Frog</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheLinearFrog.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheLinearFrog.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I was given a problem recently, and I was really pleased to get
the solution. I wonder if you can (a) solve it, and (b) tell me
where it comes from. I've not been able to track it down at all.
It's the problem of the Linear Baby Frog.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Seventy Versus One Hundred Revisited</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SeventyVersusOneHundredRevisited.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SeventyVersusOneHundredRevisited.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Earlier we looked at the situation of two identical cars,
one doing 70, the other doing 100, slamming on their brakes
at exactly the same location to avoid an obstruction.  The
model we used was that the two cars shed energy at a rate
proportional to distance.  But what if the rate energy is
shed is proportional not to distance, but to time?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>How The Farrago Works</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/HowTheFarragoWorks.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/HowTheFarragoWorks.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago I was asked about the way this website works,
and as I started to explain, I realised just how much there
was going on and how complicated it seemed. But they seemed
to think it was neat and elegant, so I thought I'd write it
up. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Seventy Versus One Hundred</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SeventyVersusOneHundred.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SeventyVersusOneHundred.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Supposed two identical cars are traveling along the same
straight road, with one traveling at 70 kilometres an hour,
the other at 100 kilometres an hour.  Just as the faster
car draws roughly level with the slower, they both see an
obstruction in the road ahead, and (as luck would have it)
at the exact same moment, exactly when they are level with
each other, they both slam on the brakes. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Powers Of Two In Lex Order</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PowersOfTwoInLexOrder.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PowersOfTwoInLexOrder.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I was sent a lovely little twitchet, so I thought
I'd share it for people to think about. No answers provided.
Firstly, let's do something odd with the powers of two ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Emerging e Expanded</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/EmergingEExpanded.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/EmergingEExpanded.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Expanding on the post from earlier, and with more detail ...
put "10" into a calculator and take the square root.  Then
again, then again, then again, and so on.  Fairly quickly we
get a number that's marginally larger than 1, so we can think
of it as 1 plus small rubbish.  But thinking carefully about
the rubbish leads to some interesting results.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rage Inducing System Implementation</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RageInducingSystemImplementation.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RageInducingSystemImplementation.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I'm about to go on an extended business trip, so I'm making note
of broadcast TV programs that I want to record, and making sure
there is enough space on the recorder. I have a large external
HDD attached, so I've been transferring programs to that to make
space on the internal HDD. All was going well. There's still 240
hours of space on the external HDD, so no problems anticipated.
What could possibly go wrong?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Book Is Not Always Right</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheBookIsNotAlwaysRight.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheBookIsNotAlwaysRight.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Recently someone tweeted a picture of a page from a book. It
seems to be some sort a book about maths aimed at students,
but in one simple paragraph there was just so much wrong, it
attracted many comments from many of my friends and colleagues. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Emerging e ...</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/EmergingE.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/EmergingE.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Start with 10, and square root many times over.  After a while you
get 1+(rubbish).  Taking the square root of that halves the rubbish,
so we can deduce that when epsilon is small, 10 to the power of
epsilon is 1 plus some constant times epsilon.  Starting with 5
instead of 10 you get a different constant, so we have a function
where you start with a value, successively take the square root,
compute the constant, and that's the value of the function. Looking
at this function, I have questions ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Impossible To Translate</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ImpossibleToTranslate.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ImpossibleToTranslate.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago, while on a business trip to Spain, I was
asked a question that turns out to be impossible to
translate into English.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Waiting In Vain</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WaitingInVain.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WaitingInVain.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Over the past few years I've occasionally been contacted by my
ISP to say that one of my scripts had gone rogue and was using
100% CPU, and would it be OK to kill it.  This has always been
a surprise to me because I'm usually pretty careful about my
code, especially when it's running "out there" on someone
else's hardware.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Non-Repeating Decimals</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NonRepeatingDecimals.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NonRepeatingDecimals.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
In the previous post we talked about repeating decimals, and showed
that every (eventually) repeating decimal is a rational number, and
that every rational number has a (possibly trivial) (eventually)
repeating decimal representation.  Now we'll look at some cases of
decimals that don't repeat, and hence are irrational, and vice versa.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rational Repeats</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RationalRepeats.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RationalRepeats.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Recently on-line I saw someone talking about the decimal expansion
of pi, and they said: "I'm told pi goes on forever and never repeats,
I can't see how that can be proved."  I didn't try to explain how pi
never repeats, but I did have a go at explaining some of the ideas.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why is it Lovely</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhyIsItLovely.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhyIsItLovely.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Recently on one of my "social network feeds" I saw a post saying:
"X% of Y equals Y% of X."  I commented that this was lovely, and
someone asked "Why?"
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Compiling Crypto-Connections</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/CompilingCryptoConnections.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/CompilingCryptoConnections.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
Having given the maths club talk last Saturday (which went very well)
I was left with the preparative work that I'd done.  That consists of
lists of concepts, people, algorithms, cryptosystems, and some of the
connections between them.  What to do with it ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Exploring Connections Between Crypto Systems</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ExploringConnectionsBetweenCryptoSystems.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ExploringConnectionsBetweenCryptoSystems.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I'm giving a talk for the Liverpool Maths Club this Saturday, April
23rd, 2019.  I do this roughly twice a year, and it's always a real
challenge - the ages range between 13 and 18, and while some of the
students have been coming for years, for others it might be their
first time. So whatever the topic might be, it needs to be engaging,
accessible, and challenging, all at the same time.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Meeting Elwyn Berlekamp</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ElwynBerlekampHasLeftUs.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ElwynBerlekampHasLeftUs.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
I remember meeting Elwyn Berlekamp.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Root Cause Analysis and the Photocopier Question</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RootCauseAnalysisAndThePhotocopierQuestion.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RootCauseAnalysisAndThePhotocopierQuestion.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
<description>
"Root Cause Analysis" is complex, involved, and requires both
tenacity and creativity.  When there's a problem, often the cause
isn't a simple, single thing, it's often a collection of things,
and each of those might not be easily characterised.  Even so,
it's a crucial exercise in many technology based industries and
activities. So in this post I want to talk about my most recent
brush with the challenges of performing RCA, and even of getting
other people to see that it's there to be done.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Up/Down Tides</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheUpDownTides.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheUpDownTides.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So while in orbit at about the altitude of the ISS we've looked at
throwing a ball sideways, and we've looked at throwing a ball forwards
or backwards.  What happens if we throw the ball up?  Or down?  Is that
different?  Do we finally have the ball travel away in a straight line
at a constant speed?  What new horrors lie in store?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Fore/Aft Tide</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheForeAftTide.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheForeAftTide.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
You're in orbit around the Earth with the International Space Station,
and you have a juggling ball. (Don't ask). You hold it next to your
helmet and release it, and it just stays there, apparently floating.
Now gently push the ball ahead of you in orbit. In effect you are
throwing the ball away from you, and the expectation is that it will
drift away from you in a straight line at a constant speed. But it
doesn't.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Sideways Tide</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheSidewaysTide.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheSidewaysTide.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Stand outside the International Space Station and hold a juggling ball
right by your helmet.  Let it go, and it will stay there.  Now give it
a gentle push "sideways".  As you will probably know, it then travels
away from you in a straight line at a constant speed, because that's
what happens in zero gravity.  But it doesn't ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wrapping Up Wrapping Up The Earth</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WrappingUpWrappingUpTheEarth.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WrappingUpWrappingUpTheEarth.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
We're coming to the end of this series.  Our friend has purchased
too much rope, too little rope, too much miraculous wrapping sheet,
and now, finally, we come to the question of too little.  But first,
let's look at the different "rope" scenarios, and see what happens
in each of the analogous "sheet" cases.  Then we'll see how it all
comes together.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The *Other* Wrapping The Earth Problem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheOtherWrappingTheEarthProblem.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheOtherWrappingTheEarthProblem.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Having gone around the world to wrap it, in truth our friend is too
tired (or too lazy) to prop up the wrapping everywhere. So just as in
the Other Rope Around the Earth problem, instead we look at propping
it up in just one place.  We need to take up one million square
metres of excess.  How high will that tent pole have to be?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The "Wrapping The Earth" Problem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WrappingTheEarth.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WrappingTheEarth.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Our friend once again has too much to drink, and once again indulges
in a little late night internet shopping.  This time, however, it's
fueled by curiousity, having discovered that there is a material that
is infinitely stretchy, but which always retains its area.  So while
you can stretch it one direction, it will keep its area by shrinking
in another direction.  What if we try to wrap the Earth ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Ring Of Steel</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheRingOfSteel.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheRingOfSteel.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Our friend has encircled the Earth with Rope, discovered that
it's 6 metres longer than needed, so expanded the circle by
0.95 metres to take up the slack. Thus we have a ring of rope
around the Earth at height just about 1 metre.  But overnight,
somehow, magically, the rope gets converted to steel!  Then,
over breakfast, a slight Earth tremor gently rattles the props,
and they all fall down, leaving the ring of steel completely
unsupported.

What happens next?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rounding Up The Ropes</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RoundingUpTheRopes.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RoundingUpTheRopes.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
We've seen the $(Other)^k$ rope around the Earth for
$k=0, 1, 2,$ and $3$.  In this post we'll look at $k=4$,
but we'll start with a "heads up" for where we'll be going next.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Other Other Other Rope Around The Earth</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/OtherOtherOtherRopeAroundTheEarth.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/OtherOtherOtherRopeAroundTheEarth.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So we have the Rope Around the Earth problem,
the Other Rope Around the Earth problem,
and the Other Other Rope Around the Earth.  
You might think that was the end of it, but no, there is more!
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Rope Around The Earth - Refined</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RopeAroundTheEarthRefined.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RopeAroundTheEarthRefined.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
As previously mentioned, the Rope Around the Earth problem is
a lovely one, and everyone should know it. But even if you do,
there's still a nice added extra. In this post we'll have a
look at that.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Other Rope Around The Earth</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheOtherRopeAroundTheEarth.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheOtherRopeAroundTheEarth.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
The well-known "Rope Around the Earth" problem is lovely, and, as
I say, well known.  But some time ago David Bedford mentioned
*another* rope around the Earth problem.  A *different* rope
around the Earth problem.  And it goes like this.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Elementary Estimates</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ElementaryEstimates.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ElementaryEstimates.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Every now and again as I'm doing various estimates or calculations
I use an approximation, and a few days ago it was brought home to me
how much I rely on these, and how few people know them. So I thought
I'd gather some of them together in one place to be a reference.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Latitude Correction</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LatitudeCorrection.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LatitudeCorrection.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I've been discussing the details of measuring the
size of the Earth by watching a shadow descending a wall at
sunrise, or ascending at sunset. The sums are easy enough if
you do it at either Equinox, and at the Equator.  
But what if you're not at the Equator?  What then?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Just Give Me The Answer</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/JustGiveMeTheAnswer.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/JustGiveMeTheAnswer.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2018 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A while ago I saw an exchange on a programming forum I visit on occasion.
A poster had asked a question that at first sight (and in all honesty,
subsequent examination) appeared pretty simple. The poster claimed to
have tried everything they could think of, that nothing worked, and
they'd appreciate any help.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>More Musing On Pollard Rho</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MoreMusingOnPollardRho.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MoreMusingOnPollardRho.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
After my previous post I started to explore a little more about
how the function in Pollard Rho affects what's going on.  As yet
I've not come to any conclusions, and I'm currently deep in the
"I'm confused" stage of the exploration. I'm sure there are other
people know all this, but I don't know who they are, and haven't
been able to find any write-ups, so I'll just carry on.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Idle Thoughts About Pollard Rho</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IdleThoughtsAboutPollardRho.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IdleThoughtsAboutPollardRho.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I've had an idle thought about the Pollard Rho method of
integer factoring. To start with, let's sketch how it works.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>When Optimising Code, Measure</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhenOptimisingCodeMeasure.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhenOptimisingCodeMeasure.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
This is a truism that lots of people quote, but it can be hard to
remember, especially in the heat of battle (as it were).  Rather
fortunately it came to mind just when needed, as I found something
completely unexpected.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Dog Called Mixture</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ADogCalledMixture.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ADogCalledMixture.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some considerable time ago I was giving some talks at a school, and
my wife and I were kindly hosted at the home of the Headmaster and
his family.  And his menagerie, as it turned out.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Another PayPal Scam</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnotherPayPalScam.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnotherPayPalScam.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Received as part of the newsletter of a publishing company :
We've been living in interesting times at Wildside Press since our
last newsletter. Our PayPal account was VERY creatively hacked, and
we briefly lost about $15,000 of the money we'd been saving up for
royalty payments to authors.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why Top Posting Has Won</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhyTopPostingHasWon.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhyTopPostingHasWon.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I've recently realised that, in my head, there's a connection
between top-posting in email and washing the dishes. Stay
with me, I'll see if I can make the connection for you.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Archimedes' "Hat Box" Theorem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ArchimedesHatBoxTheorem.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ArchimedesHatBoxTheorem.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2018 11:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Take a sphere, and encase it in a cylinder.  Take a horizontal slice
between two planes.  You end up with a narrow cylinder, and a smaller,
"slopey" cylinder.

The Archimedes Hat-Box Theorem says these two cylinders have the same
surface area.  In fact the theorem says that the surface areas are the
same no matter how thick the slice is, so as a consequence we can take
a "slice" that captures the entire cylinder and sphere, and that means
that the surface area of the curved surface of the cylinder is exactly
the same as the surface area of the sphere.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Considering a Sphere</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ConsideringASphere.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ConsideringASphere.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 14:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently someone posted an animation of a way to visualise the area of
a circle. Someone else then asked if there was a similar visualisation
of the volume of a sphere, or the surface area of a sphere, and that
started me thinking. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>To Link Or Not To Link</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ToLinkOrNotToLink.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ToLinkOrNotToLink.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 14:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Over the past few years I've noticed a rise in a particular type of
spam that I'm receiving.  It takes the form of an email like this ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Generic Advice For Writing A Thesis</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GenericAdviceForWritingAThesis.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GenericAdviceForWritingAThesis.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 20:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I have some generic thesis-writing advice to supplement
that given by your supervisor, but only if it's welcome.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Just Teach My Child The Maths</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/JustTeachMyChildTheMaths.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/JustTeachMyChildTheMaths.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2018 09:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
It is astounding to me that mathematics - of all school
subjects - elicits such potent emotional reaction when
"reform" is in the air.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not A Spectator Sport</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NotASpectatorSport.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NotASpectatorSport.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 13:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
One of my university lecturers gave what we all thought were dreadful
lectures.  Muddled, unclear, chaotic, with no discernible thread.  It
took ages to reconstruct and rework the material to a point where we
could attack the problems and old exam questions.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Left Truncatable Prime</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LeftTruncatablePrime.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LeftTruncatablePrime.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2017 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently Maths Inspiration produced some pencils with a fantastic idea.
Yes, their name is on it, yes, it has a slightly cheesy catch-phrase,
But then there is something really clever.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Doctor and the Lawyer</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheDoctorAndTheLawyer.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheDoctorAndTheLawyer.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2017 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A doctor and a lawyer were chatting at a party when someone approached
the doctor. They wanted advice, and started to describe their symptoms
when the doctor interrupted and said "It might be better to make an
appointment so we can talk in private."
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Four Points Two Distances Proof</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FourPointsTwoDistancesProof.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FourPointsTwoDistancesProof.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
The Four Points Puzzle challenge that Peter Winkler set me was this:
"Find all configurations of four (distinct) points in the plane that
determine exactly two distances." He then added: "Nearly everyone
misses at least one, and every solution has been missed by at least
one person." So the challenge isn't to find all the configurations
so much as to be able to prove that you have them all.  It's the proof
that matters.  Here's mine.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Meeting Ron Graham</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MeetingRonGraham.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MeetingRonGraham.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2017 18:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I was a lowly PhD student when I first met Ron Graham. It was at a
conference, and there was something I wanted to show him. In my mind
it was pretty much guaranteed that he would be interested, but he was
(and still is!) extremely well known, extremely eminent, and extremely
popular. As a result he is extremely busy, and somewhat besieged with
people, all wanting a piece of his time. How could I possibly attract
and hold his attention long enough to get him interested?

So I hatched a plan.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Napkin Ring Vs Spherical Cap</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NapkinRingVersusSphericalCap.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NapkinRingVersusSphericalCap.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 08:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Many years ago I was at a semi-social gathering and a somewhat odd
incident occurred.  Over the course of conversation it emerged that
I was studying maths, and one chap, at one point, turned to me and
said: "So, do you like puzzles, then?"  Not especially on my guard
I said yes, and he went on to say something like this:  "OK, I'll
give you a puzzle ..."
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Four Points Puzzle</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheFourPointsPuzzle.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheFourPointsPuzzle.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
At the MOVES conference in New York in August I was lucky enough to
spend some time with Peter Winkler, mathematician, puzzle master
extraordinaire, and author of "Mathematical Puzzles: A Connoisseur's
Collection".  As we talked about many things he set me this puzzle:
"Find all configurations of four (distinct) points in the plane that
determine exactly two distances."
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Radius of the Earth - Part Two</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RadiusOfTheEarthPartTwo.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RadiusOfTheEarthPartTwo.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2017 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some nine and a bit weeks ago I posted about a method of calculating
(or estimating) The Radius Of The Earth using a stopwatch and watching
the Sun at sunrise (or sunset).  When "Mike the Sundial" told me the
idea I was quite simply stunned at the simplicity and elegance. Colin
Beveridge took up the challenge. But when I read his calculation I was
interested to see just how different his take was from mine.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Grep Timing Anomaly</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GrepTimingAnomaly.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GrepTimingAnomaly.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some considerable time ago - long enough that probably the details
are no longer relevant, or accurate - I got seriously fed up with
the spam filtering on my email service.  There were so many false
positives that I had to wade through the spam bin every day, pulling
out obviously good emails that needed attention.  It got so that it
cost me more time to have it running.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Radius of the Earth</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheRadiusOfTheEarth.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheRadiusOfTheEarth.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
The talk/workshop I give about computing the distance to the Moon uses,
it claims, nothing more than a pendulum and a stopwatch. And while it's
sort of true that it uses nothing else, it's not really true, because it
also uses the period of the Moon, and the size of the Earth. Now it might
be possible to persuade you that it's OK to use the period of the Moon,
since you can simply look out the window and measure that for yourself,
but to use the size of the Earth seems a bit of a stretch.  Surely there
is no way to compute that from your back garden.  But there is.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>This Works to Cure My Hiccoughs</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThisWorksToCureMyHiccoughs.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThisWorksToCureMyHiccoughs.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2017 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
It's many years ago that I was told about this trick.  People rarely
believe me, but it honestly works for me, and it has worked for others.
So I thought I'd write it up.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Perhaps We Saved One</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PerhapsWeSavedOne.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PerhapsWeSavedOne.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2017 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Many years ago a good friend of mine, Bill Mullarkey, organised a
"Science and Technology Extravaganza" in Wigan.  It was a fabulous
two-day event with hundreds of teenagers and adults in attendance.
The buzz of excitement was huge, and it was an honour to be part
of the whole thing.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thinking About Mastodon</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThinkingAboutMastodon.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThinkingAboutMastodon.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2017 17:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some people are describing Mastodon as a decentralised Twitter, but that's
rather misleading.  It's better not to try to understand it like that.
Instead, here's my way of thinking.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Disappearing Trains On Virgin</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DisappearingTrainsOnVirgin.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DisappearingTrainsOnVirgin.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2017 18:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I'm planning a significant set of travels, so as always, I started by
sketching an idea of what might be possible, then confirmed the various
parts on the usual National Rail web site.  Having picked my trains,
I then went to the Virgin Trains web site to actually buy the tickets.
This time there was a surprise awating me.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Independence Game</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheIndependenceGame.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheIndependenceGame.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A few weeks ago I was honoured to be able to attend the gathering at the
Royal Society where Rob Eastaway was given his Christopher Zeeman medal.
He gave an excellent talk, full of interest and humour, the only downside
being that he made us play a game.  Although at the time Rob called it
"Avoid the Neighbours", I now think of it simply as "Rob's Dots".  He
said he didn't know how to play it optimally beyond 11 points, so
I thought I'd have a go.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>One Of My Favourite Puzzles</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/OneOfMyFavouritePuzzles.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/OneOfMyFavouritePuzzles.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
It is impossible to choose a single problem as my favourite.  There
are so many, each with their own attractions, each with their own
charms. But there is one that I solved quickly, and then found that
I had only just started to scratch the surface.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Thinking About Recursion</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThinkingAboutRecursion.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThinkingAboutRecursion.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
It has been said that there are two hard problems in computing:
Cache Invalidation, Naming Things, and Off-By-One Errors.
Well, that's certainly true when you get into the practice of
programming.  But on the way to becoming a programmer we find
that there are multiple levels of enlightenment.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Memorising The Tube</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MemorisingTheTube.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MemorisingTheTube.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I memorised the period table of elements. When I tell
people that, the response has generally been a moderate pause,
followed by a rather puzzled - "Why?"  So I thought I'd explain.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Spikey Spheres</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SpikeySpheres.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SpikeySpheres.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2016 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I've recently been working on an optimisation problem, and I've
come to realise that I can consider it as wandering around on a
smooth landscape in 1800 dimensions.  The problem is that while
the error function may be "smooth," your intuition of what this
means is wrong.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Surprisingly Quick</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SurprisinglyQuick.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SurprisinglyQuick.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
In the 1990s I had a job at Liverpool University doing research into
how we might make it possible for non-computing specialists to use
paraallel computers.  Even today, over 20 years later, this is still
an unsolved problem, and the machines now are designed to be easier
to use.  The machine I was using was a Parsys SuperNode with 96 T800
transputers, hooked together with a reconfigurable switch, cunningly
designed so that any 4-regular network could be realised.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>An Unexpected Fraction</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnUnexpectedFraction.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnUnexpectedFraction.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
On 2016-09-09, @MEIMaths tweeted an image and said: "Start with any
convex quadrilateral.  Mark the midpoint of each side, join these
midpoints to the vertex two places clockwise around the quadrilateral.
What fraction of the original quadrilateral is the new quadrilateral?"
From the way it's phrased you'd expect the answer to be the same
regardless of the quadrilateral chosen ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>You Have To Admire Their Optimism</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/YouHaveToAdmireTheirOptimism.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/YouHaveToAdmireTheirOptimism.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>28 Aug 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Coming back from Australia, Rachel and I landed at Heathrow
(which we usually avoid) and caught trains back home.  Our
final leg was from Chester to home, and I had a look at the
live departures board to see how things were looking. There
I found something puzzling ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Representatives Matter</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RepresentativesMatter.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RepresentativesMatter.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>10 Jul 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
My uncle has a Ferrari, and it has led him to make an interesting observation.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Pythagoras By Incircle</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PythagorasByIncircle.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PythagorasByIncircle.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>08 Jun 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago I was working on a puzzle about incircles, and
unexpectedly a proof of Pythagoras' Theorem dropped out!  I'm
sure it's well known to people who know lots about Pythagoras'
Theorem, but I thought I'd share it.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Puzzle About Puzzles</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/APuzzleAboutPuzzles.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/APuzzleAboutPuzzles.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>31 May 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago a friend of mine, Adam Atkinson, mentioned to me what he
referred to as "Semi-Chestnuts" - puzzles that should be classics, but
are for some reason effectively unknown.  Recently one of these caught
the attention of the Twitter-verse.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>How not to do Twitter</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/HowNotToDoTwitter.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/HowNotToDoTwitter.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>24 May 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I had an exchange on Twitter that beautifully exemplifies
how companies get it so totally, totally wrong.  Usually I don't
name names, but on this occasion it's just spectacularly bad, and
then they asked me to point them at a write-up, that I've decided
to go ahead and do so.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Calculating 52 Factorial By Hand</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/Calculating52FactorialByHand.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/Calculating52FactorialByHand.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>04 Jan 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago I gave a talk where I showed that something unexpected
happening with a deck of playing cards. I had some volunteers try it,
and while they did so I talked about just how many orderings there are
for 52 cards.  To do this I computed (an approximation to) 52!
(52 factorial) by hand.  It's not so hard - you just calculate 54!
and then divide by 3000.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sometimes small things aren't</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SmallThingsMightNotBeSoSmall.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SmallThingsMightNotBeSoSmall.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>02 Jan 2016 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Twenty years ago (or thereabouts) there was a Christmas road safety
campaign in which they said: "Wearing a seatbelt doubles your chance
of surviving an accident."  But that's obviously nonsense.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Not If You Hurry</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NotIfYouHurry.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NotIfYouHurry.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>20 Dec 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
On one occasion, when I was a teenager, I was in the car with my
parents going somewhere.  We had to turn right (equivalent to
turning left in the States) and hence had to cross a lane of
traffic and merge into the far lane. My father was looking to
the right to see if there was anything approaching in the lane
we had to cross, and asked my mother - "Is there anything coming?"
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Factoring Via Graph Three Colouring</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FactoringViaGraphThreeColouring.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FactoringViaGraphThreeColouring.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>17 Dec 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Occasionally someone comes to me and says that they have a polynomial
time algorithm for solving an NP-Complete problem. More specifically,
someone came to me and said they could Graph Vertex Three Colour (G3C)
in polynomial time.  They'd tried lots of example, and it always
worked.  So I produced a graph ... They didn't come back. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Another Proof Of The Doodle Theorem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnotherProofOfTheDoodleTheorem.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnotherProofOfTheDoodleTheorem.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>16 Dec 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So on the "Doodle Theorem" page we have a proof of, yes, you guessed it, the
Doodle Theorem.  Here, on a page entitled "Another Proof of the Doodle Theorem"
we have, yes, you guessed it, another proof of the Doodle Theorem.  However,
here we take a rather unusual approach ...  
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>When Obvious Is Not Obvious</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhenObviousIsNotObvious.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WhenObviousIsNotObvious.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>15 Dec 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>There's an old story that goes something like this:
A math professor is teaching a class, and in the middle of a proof
he says "Clearly we have the following." A student puts up his
hand and says: "That's not clear to me."
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Graph Three (Vertex) Colouring</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GraphThreeColouring.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GraphThreeColouring.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>13 Dec 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Here is something you may have seen before. Take a map, any map, and
colour the regions so that if two regions share a border, they must
get different colours.  In this post we start with the usual game,
but take off in an unusual direction and quickly find ourselves in
deeper waters.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Doodle Theorem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheDoodleTheorem.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheDoodleTheorem.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>12 Dec 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
The Doodle Theorem says that any map drawn with a single pen
stroke that returns to its starting point can be two-coloured.
Here's one proof.  
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Be Careful What You Say</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BeCarefulWhatYouSay.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BeCarefulWhatYouSay.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>25 Oct 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Here's an amazing story.  A young child writing to a popular
television programme with wild claims and, quite frankly,
ridiculous aspirations.  The output is a lesson to us all.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Mutilated Chessboard Revisited</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheMutilatedChessboardRevisited.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheMutilatedChessboardRevisited.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>10 Oct 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Puzzle enthusiasts know that a really good puzzle is more than just
a problem to solve.  The very best problems and puzzles can provide
insights that go beyond the original setting. Sometimes even classic
puzzles can turn up something new and interesting.  Here we re-visit
the classic question of when we can tile a chessboard with dominoes.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Mirror Copied</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AMirrorCopied.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AMirrorCopied.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>16 Aug 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description> So earlier I asked: What do you get when you photocopy a mirror?  But the real question, as I then expanded, is not "What do you get?" but: "Why *must* you get that?"  Can we deduce from first principles, based only on what a good photocopier must do, what the result will be?  I claim the answer is "Yes," although there are some who disagree.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Other, Other Rope Around The Earth</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheOtherOtherRopeAroundTheEarth.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheOtherOtherRopeAroundTheEarth.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>01 Aug 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>There's a classic problem: Upon stretching a rope around the Earth, you find that you have 6 metres excess. So you join the ends, and then go around the Earth propping up the rope equally everywhere. How high will it be?  An alternative that's been suggested is that instead of propping it up equally everywhere, just prop it up as high as possible in one place.  But now Bill Mullins has asked me yet another variant. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Photocopy A Mirror</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PhotocopyAMirror.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PhotocopyAMirror.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>29 Jul 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently on Twitter I asked the question: What do you get when you photocopy a mirror?  But really the question isn't "What do you get?" - the real question is "Why is that the right thing to get?"
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Point Of The Banach Tarski Theorem</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThePointOfTheBanachTarskiTheorem.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThePointOfTheBanachTarskiTheorem.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>06 Jun 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
There's a classic "Limited Audience" joke/riddle that goes:
Q: What's an anagram of "Banach-Tarski"?
A: "Banach-Tarski Banach-Tarski."
Now, if you already know what the Banach-Tarski
theorem says, that riddle is really funny.  If
you don't then you're simply not in the audience,
and you'll just go: "Huh?"  In this article we
have a look at why the Banach-Tarski theorem is
more than just a curiosity.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sieve Of Eratosthenes In Python</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SieveOfEratosthenesInPython.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SieveOfEratosthenesInPython.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>24 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
One of the things we need to do when finding Perrin Pseudo-Primes is to recognise prime numbers so we can see if the numbers predicted by the Perrin test to be prime, are. So we need to generate primes.  For small primes (for some definition of "small") this can be done quickly and efficiently by using the Sieve of Eratosthenes.  Here we use a dynamically generated collection of filters, one for each prime, and run down the list of all numbers, filtering as we go. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Fast Perrin Test</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FastPerrinTest.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FastPerrinTest.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>19 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So we've got scaffolding to look for Perrin Pseudo-Primes (PPPs), assuming any exist (which they do) but as we run the existing code we find that it's spending pretty much all its time in the test as to whether n divides k(n). Now we look to speed that up ... 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Russian Peasant Multiplication</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RussianPeasantMultiplication.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RussianPeasantMultiplication.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>18 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Sometimes simply called "Peasant Multiplication," sometimes called "Ancient Egyptian multiplication," sometimes called "Ethiopian multiplication," sometimes called "Multiplication by Doubling and Halving," this algorithm is well-known to some, a mystery to others, and more useful than you might think, being applicable not just to multiplication of numbers, but also useful for exponentiation, and for matrices. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Finding Perrin Pseudo Primes, Part 2</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FindingPerrinPseudoPrimes_Part2.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FindingPerrinPseudoPrimes_Part2.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>17 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So now we've got the scaffolding of a program to find these Perrin Pseudo-Primes. The timing shows that it overwhelmingly spends all of its time in the routine to test whether or not a number passes the "Perrin Test." So there are a few things we need to do. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Finding Perrin Pseudo Primes, Part 1</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FindingPerrinPseudoPrimes_Part1.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FindingPerrinPseudoPrimes_Part1.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>15 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A while ago I was asked: Consider the sequence k(n) with k(1)=0, k(2)=2, k(3)=3, and k(n)=k(n-2)+k(n-3).  Why is it true that n divides k(n) if and only if n is prime?" My immediate response was "Well, it's not true."  So I was challenged to find a counter-example.  
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Unwise Update</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheUnwiseUpdate.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheUnwiseUpdate.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>13 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
This story passed on to me first-hand from the engineer involved.
It's a true story about how insufficient knowledge among operating
personnel about the operational consequences of new technology may
have accidental effects.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Miles Per Gallon</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MilesPerGallon.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MilesPerGallon.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>03 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I remember a while ago attending a talk that did something utterly
bizarre with units of "miles per gallon."  I don't remember much
about it, but I thought I'd attempt to reconstruct the process in
a post, just to see how far I get, what conclusion I reach, and
whether people think it's as bonkers as I do.  Here we go ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Tracking An Item On Hacker News</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TrackingAnItemOnHackerNews.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TrackingAnItemOnHackerNews.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>02 May 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A couple of weeks ago I had an exchange with a user on
Hacker News about user "ages."  I wrote that up in my
previous post, and then submitted it.  I was surprised
that the item garnered enough attention to make it to
the front page, but that was when a little foresight
paid off.  I don't usually bother with analytics on my
site, but on this occasion I put a tracker on the page
to count the number and times of page hits.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hacker News User Ages</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/HackerNewsUserAges.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/HackerNewsUserAges.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>19 Apr 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A few days ago I was reading Hacker News and someone had
posted a poll with the following question:
How old is your HN account?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Poking The Dusty Corners</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PokingTheDustyCorners.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PokingTheDustyCorners.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>14 Apr 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
In chatting with people about what a maths degree is, and what it
does for you, I've often been intrigued by a particular response.
I've shown them something that they expect to be true (or false)
and then shown that their expectations can be confounded.  When
I do that, a common response is "Well, you're just being stupid."
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>There Is No Time For This</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThereIsNoTimeForThis.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ThereIsNoTimeForThis.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>03 Apr 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I'm finding these days that I just don't have
the time to do everything myself.  I don't have
time to evaluate everything on its merit ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Publically Sharing Links</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PublicallySharingLinks.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/PublicallySharingLinks.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>05 Jan 2015 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
For years I've been visiting, reading, and contributing to a site
called "Hacker News."  About 3.5 years ago I basically withdrew,
finding it increasingly frustrating, but I never really went away.
Slowly I've returned and contributed again, although not at the same
level, and generally just by contributing links and not often getting
involved in the discussions.  But once again I'm getting frustrated
and want to leave, but where else can I share things I find, and then
enter into discussions?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Learning Times Tables</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LearningTimesTables.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/LearningTimesTables.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>14 Dec 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Should primary school students be drilled on their times tables?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Graceful Degradation</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GracefulDegradation.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/GracefulDegradation.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>12 Dec 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
I first learned about graceful degradation from a colleague.  He prefaced
his story by saying that good people learn from their mistakes, but the
best people learn from other people's mistakes.  This is a bit like the
saying in aviation circles that a good landing is one you can walk away
from, an excellent landing is when they can use the 'plane again ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Diagramming Maths Topics</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DiagrammingMathsTopics.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DiagrammingMathsTopics.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>22 Nov 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
An impossible task, but wouldn't it be useful to have some sort
of diagram of topics in maths, connected somehow to show the links
between topics?  How could such a diagram been created?  How could
it be explored?  How could it be dynamic?  Maintainable?  Usable?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>On the Rack</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/OnTheRack.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/OnTheRack.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>26 Aug 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
When travelling, I usually go as light as possible.  Certainly when
travelling by plane I try to go "hand luggage only", and when doing
various mini-tours of talks, and so on, I try to travel with just a
single, small backpack.  Sometimes it's not possible, but I usually
manage.  Here's a story of one time when this had unexpected
consequences ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Square Root By Long Division</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SquareRootByLongDivision.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SquareRootByLongDivision.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>11 Aug 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
The other day someone asked:
"Is the product of 4 consecutive positive integers always one less than a square?"  
Good question. The answer is yes, and I solved it using a technique the interlocutor
didn't know.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Beyond the Boundary</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BeyondTheBoundary.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BeyondTheBoundary.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>23 May 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
In which we show that 1+2+4+8+16+... is not equal to -1, and how that
might both surprise us, and not surprise us.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Fill In The Gaps</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FillInTheGaps.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/FillInTheGaps.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>03 May 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently I had an interesting conversation on twitter, insofar as one can
have a conversation at all in that medium. It started with the following
perfectly reasonable question ... "Sorry for what may be a stupid question,
but sin(x)/x has a limit of 1 as x -> 0, so does it not cross x=0 at 1?"
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Software Checklist</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SoftwareChecklist.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SoftwareChecklist.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>24 Apr 2014 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
During the second World War, fighter pilots would scramble to take off.
Their heart would stop when the engine mis-fired. Was the fuel mix too
rich, or too lean? Turn the control wrong way and they could die ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>NASA Space Crews</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NASASpaceCrews.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/NASASpaceCrews.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>10 Feb 2013 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
In the Apollo missions many of the crew were experienced, but some were
not.  So I drew a diagram - see what patterns you see.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Birthday Paradox</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheBirthdayParadox.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheBirthdayParadox.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>06 Nov 2012 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A classic puzzle/paradox is to ask: How many people do you need to have
in a room before two of them share a birthday.  In this post we see what
happens when 365 is not equal to 365, and how this affects computing the
sizes of hash spaces.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Trapezium Conundrum</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheTrapeziumConundrum.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheTrapeziumConundrum.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>17 Apr 2012 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Clear, precise, unambiguous and useful definitions are hard to come by
in the real world. In maths we have the luxury of creating definitions
that we want, and then chasing down the consequences. If the definition
doesn't produce what we want, we can change it.  But even things, things
aren't always as easy as we might hope.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Revisting the Ant</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RevisitingTheAnt.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RevisitingTheAnt.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>20 Feb 2012 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So last time in TheAntAndTheRubberBand we were talking about an infinitely
patient ant walking on an infinitely stretchy rubber band.  If you haven't
already, you'll need to read that.

So here's what's happening.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Ant and the Rubber Band</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheAntAndTheRubberBand.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheAntAndTheRubberBand.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>09 Feb 2012 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
There's a 1 metre long rubber band, and an ant, standing on it at one end.
The ant starts walking along it at a speed of 1 cm/min.  Every minute the
rubber band is stretched (uniformly and instantaneously) to be one metre
longer. The question is this: Will the ant ever get to the far end?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Irrationals Exist</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IrrationalsExist.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/IrrationalsExist.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>20 Dec 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
For this post I thought I'd have a quick diversion into talking about
the so-called "Real Numbers." Upon reflection, however, I found that
there was so much I wanted to say that there was no way to fit it sensibly
into a single post. So instead I'll put some preliminary comments here,
and then expand on them later.  
In particular, I'll give an explicit proof that for every interval you
choose of non-zero length, there is an irrational in it.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Multiple Choice Probability Puzzle</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MultipleChoiceProbabilityPuzzle.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/MultipleChoiceProbabilityPuzzle.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>15 Nov 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Recently the following puzzle was running around the 'net:
If you choose an answer at random, what is your probability
of being correct:  A: 25%; B: 50%; C: 60%; D: 25% ?

The immediate thought is - there are four options, so if I pick
one at random then each has a one in four chance of being chosen.
That means the answer is 1/4, or 25%.  But that doesn't work ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Random Eratosthenes</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RandomEratosthenes.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/RandomEratosthenes.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>28 Oct 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Why do people think of the primes as somehow being "random"?
What does that mean? How can we investigate?  In this post
I'll talk about a way of generating primes, and then see what
happens when we toss in some randomness, just for fun. 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wrapping Up Square Dissection</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WrappingUpSquareDissection.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WrappingUpSquareDissection.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>13 Sep 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
We now have five valid dissections, and one "dissection" that might
be regarded as invalid. So what do we mean by "a piece" and just how
many dissections are there?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dissecting a Square (Part 2)</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DissectingASquarePart2.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DissectingASquarePart2.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>08 Aug 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
So we return to the square. It's simple enough to cut it up into
identical pieces so that all the pieces touch the centre.  But in
how many ways?  I rapidly got 5 (or 6, depending on a technicality),
and I started to wonder about a proof that 5 (or 6) was all of them.
I posted a badly worded question on an internet forum, and rightly
got flamed for it, but in the answers was a shock.  There was an
infinite family of solutions.  And not just one ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dissecting a Circle</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DissectingACircle.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DissectingACircle.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>26 Jul 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
There are three possibilities when we dissect any shape:
One piece touches the centre point;
There's more than one piece and they all touch the centre point;
Two or more pieces touch the centre point, but some don't.
But what about the circle? If we just cut it like a pizza then we
get all the pieces touching the centre. No problem there.  
What about the other possibilities? 
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dissecting a square (Part 1)</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DissectingASquare.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DissectingASquare.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>01 Jun 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Some time ago I was given a challenge that turned out to be
surprisingly rich in surprises.  It all starts by trying to
dissect a square.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>An Oddity in Tennis (Part 3 of Decision Trees in Games)</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnOddityInTennis.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AnOddityInTennis.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>24 May 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
In this final part we see how a proper analysis can throw
up some surprising results in the detail, defying our
expectations.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Decision Tree For Tennis (Part 2 of Decision Trees in Games)</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DecisionTreeForTennis.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DecisionTreeForTennis.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>18 May 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Having seen the basic ideas in decision trees for games,
we now put it to real use in analysing tennis.  This is
the prelude for a surprise ...
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Decision Trees In Games (Part 1)</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DecisionTreesInGames.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DecisionTreesInGames.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>15 May 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A fairly standard exercise in probability is to ask who,
under a given scoring system, will win a game given the
probability of each move.  In this first in a series,
we look at how to analyse simple games as a prelude to
finding a surprise in a well-known example.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>A Matter of Convention</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AMatterOfConvention.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/AMatterOfConvention.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>09 May 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
There are some things in life where people argue about how they
should be, and in fact there is no single "right" answer, we just
need to agree on one of them.  So what is 6/2(2+1)?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Do You Nourish Or Tarnish?</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DoYouNourishOrTarnish.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/DoYouNourishOrTarnish.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>21 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
Interactions with others can nourish your soul, or can tarnish it.
Seek out those who nourish your soul, but ask yourself: which do
you do?
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Binary Search Reconsidered ...</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BinarySearchReconsidered.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/BinarySearchReconsidered.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>18 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
"Binary Search" was made popular as an interesting test problem
by Jon Bentley ... I was stupid - I claimed: "There is a simpler
invariant and simpler code that together have a few advantages."
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Two Equals Four</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TwoEqualsFour.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TwoEqualsFour.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>14 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A cool puzzle.  Solve one equation and discover that the
answer is two.  Solve another equation and discover that
the answer is four.  Realise that they are the same, and
confusion results.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Lost Property Office</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheLostPropertyOffice.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheLostPropertyOffice.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>11 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A story of love lost, and how administrative processes
can cost your customers time, money and good will.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>The Forgiving User Interface</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheForgivingUserInterface.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/TheForgivingUserInterface.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>05 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>
A user interface may seem obvious to the designer, but here are
some musings and examples that are not necessarily obvious. Or right.
</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Setting up RSS</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SettingUpRSS.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/SettingUpRSS.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>03 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>After my post about withdrawing from Hacker News
someone asked if I could set up an RSS feed for my "blog."
Here are the first steps.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Withdrawing from Hacker News</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WithdrawingFromHackerNews.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/WithdrawingFromHackerNews.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>03 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>For over 2 years I've been participating in a community
of programmers, entrepreneurs and people interested in similar idea,
but the time has come to move on.  Here's a post explaining why.</description>
</item>

<item>
<title>Colin's Blog</title>
<link>https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ColinsBlog.html?RSS</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.solipsys.co.uk/new/ColinsBlog.html?RSS</guid>
<pubDate>02 Apr 2011 19:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Re-starting my "blog" and trying to get the structure
to be more, well, "structured."</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
