The Sideways Tide

   
Recent changes
Table of contents
Links to this page
FRONT PAGE / INDEX

Subscribe!
@ColinTheMathmo

My latest posts can be found here:
Previous blog posts:
Additionally, some earlier writings:

The Sideways Tide

Stand outside the International Space Station (wear a space suit, otherwise you won't have time to try this) and hold a juggling ball right by your helmet. Without imparting any relative (to you) velocity, let it go, and it will stay there. It's incredibly difficult to do this, apparently, because you always move slightly as you let it go and withdraw your hand, but in theory, it will just hang there, because you are in weightless conditions.

Note that there is gravity - you are not in a gravity-free position. You are in "free-fall" (a technical term, meaning you are moving freely under the force of gravity alone), so you move together, you and the juggling ball.

We need to define "sideways". I'll use the following coordinate system.

At any given moment you can picture the line joining you with the centre of gravity of the Earth (or whatever body you're orbiting). Going along that line, towards the centre of gravity, is what I'll call "down".

You have a velocity, and that includes a direction of motion, which is parallel to the Earth's surface if you're in a circular orbit. That is what I'll call "forward".

The direction at right angles to both of these is what I'll call "sideways". If you orient yourself facing forwards, feet down, then we have a clear "left" and "right".

To maintain this orientation you will, relative to the fixed stars, rotate once every orbit to make sure your feet stay "down".

Now give it a gentle push "sideways". As you will probably know, it will then travel away from you in a straight line at a constant speed, because that's what happens in zero gravity.

But it doesn't ...

But this isn't zero gravity. This is free-fall, and that's not what happens.

If you get the direction exactly right (and the tolerances are inhumanly small) then the ball will go away from you, yes, in a straight line (more-or-less), yes, but it will slow down. After about 23.2 minutes it will come to a complete stop, and start to come back.

Another 23.2 minutes sees it return to its original position, but now travelling in the opposite direction. It keeps going, but again will slow down, coming to rest after about 23.2 minutes, before starting on its return journey, arriving back in your hand after about 92.7 minutes.

For most people, the correct reaction is - wait ... what ??

How does that happen?

These assumptions can be revisited later to see how things change in the real situation, but they are pretty good estimates as starters.
So let's see why this is true, how it works, and what the implications might be. For the sake of simplicity, let's assume that the orbit is perfectly circular, has a period of exactly 92 minutes, and that the Earth is a perfect sphere of uniform density.

When you have the ball "floating" by your helmet, you and the ball are both in circular orbit around the some point, the centre of gravity of the Earth. The two orbits are really close, so there's no real difference between them. You travel in close formation, and from your point of view, the ball "holds station" with you.

But the clue is in the phrase "from your point of view".

Looking in from the outside, you are both screaming along in a circle around the Earth at about 7.7 km/s.

So what happens when you give the ball a push? We are assuming it's a gentle push (whatever that means), and in exactly the right direction (whatever that means).

https://www.solipsys.co.uk/images/GreenAndBlueOrbits.jpg
You and the ball
What it means is that we're choosing the direction to result in the ball still travelling in an exactly circular orbit, but we've changed its "tilt" slightly. So now you and the ball are travelling in circles of the same size, with the same centre, and at the same speed. The result is as in this diagram, you in green, the ball in blue, and as you can see, the ball initially travels away from you.

But after 1/4 of an orbit you are travelling in parallel, and then the ball starts to come back to you. After 1/2 an orbit your paths cross, and the ball has returned. Then the dance repeats on the other side, until finally you are reunited after a single, complete orbit.

From your point of view, if the direction you push is exactly right, the ball will bounce back and forth through your position, as if tethered by a piece of elastic. You can look at the displacement, and the ball is literally performing simple harmonic motion through your position. It appears to you that there is a "restoring force" for the ball, but that force is, in the grand scheme of things, fictitious. It's an artifact of your rotating frame of reference.

How big is it?

We can compute the size of this apparent force. The orbital period is 92 minutes, (more accurately, the orbital period of the ISS is about 92.68 mins) and for simplicity we will assume the maximum displacement is 1 metre. Then the formula for the displacement is:

  • $D(t)=\sin(\omega t)$

When $t$ is 92 minutes the displacement has completed one full cycle, so $\omega\times(92 ~mins)=2\pi$, and $\omega=\frac{2\pi}{5520}s^{-1}$.

Now acceleration is the double derivative of that, so

  • $A(t) = -\omega^{2}\sin(\omega t)$

We evaluate that at $t$ equal to 23 minutes, which is where the ball is one metre away, and we get:

  • $A_{d=1} = -\left( \frac{2\pi}{5520} \right)^2$

Note: an earlier version had $1.3\times 10^{-7} ms^{-2}$, but I just did the sums again and got $1.3\times 10^{-6} ms^{-2}$. I don't know where the discrepancy was/is ... colour me confused.
So the acceleration is about $1.3\times 10^{-6} ms^{-2}$ for every metre you move away, and it's a restoring force, so there should be a minus sign, but I'm ignoring that for now. That's really not a lot, but it's definitely there, it's definitely real, and in larger orbital manoeuvres it is a force to be reckoned with.

In the next post ...

What happens if we throw the ball forward or backward? Will we again have a fictitious force? Will it be attracting? That's what we'll look at next time.


<<<< Prev <<<<
Wrapping Up Wrapping Up The Earth
:
>>>> Next >>>>
The Fore Aft Tide ...


https://mathstodon.xyz/@ColinTheMathmo You can follow me on Mathstodon.



Of course, you can also
follow me on twitter:

@ColinTheMathmo


Send us a comment ...

You can send us a message here. It doesn't get published, it just sends us an email, and is an easy way to ask any questions, or make any comments, without having to send a separate email. So just fill in the boxes and then

Your name :
Email :
Message :


Contents

 

Links on this page

 
Site hosted by Colin and Rachel Wright:
  • Maths, Design, Juggling, Computing,
  • Embroidery, Proof-reading,
  • and other clever stuff.

Suggest a change ( <-- What does this mean?) / Send me email
Front Page / All pages by date / Site overview / Top of page

Universally Browser Friendly     Quotation from
Tim Berners-Lee
    Valid HTML 3.2!