Optimal Pricing

   
Recent changes
Table of contents
Links to this page
FRONT PAGE / INDEX

Optimal pricing is a difficult subject, with many unquantifiable issues to take into account. However, we can analyse a particularly simple case, and build from there.

Of course, this model is pretty simplistic, but the principle is sound. In particular, even if the price-sales function is more complex, each part of it is, when you zoom in, an approximation to a straight-line.

The calculations still work too, but the price/sales response curve almost certainly can't be described by a simple function, so it must be done numerically.

Additionally, the robustness of the solution should be considered. It may be that small changes to the price/sales response curve causes the solution to "leap" to another part of the curve, giving a completely different "optimal" solution.

Finally, "optimal" is actually a relative term. Maximum profits might not be the objective of a business in a complex market. Preventing competition might be more important.

Suppose we have identical items to sell, each of which costs c to make. We have a market saturation at N, which is as many as we can dispose of even charging nothing, and that the sales drop off linearly as the price increases. That means our sales, S, are given by a formula:

S=N-ap

where a is the "drop-off factor" and is greater than zero, and p is the price charged. Then for a given price p the profits are:

P = S(p-c) = (N-ap)(p-c) = - ap^2 + (N+ac)p - cN

This is a downwards facing parabola with a maximum for some value of p. As a quick sanity check, if p=0 then we lose cN because we dispose of N, items, each costing c to provide. Substituting p=N/a we get 0, which is right because we sell none, hence make none, hence no money changes hands anywhere.

We want to maximise profit by adjusting p to get the largest P, which is not necessarily obtained by getting the maximum sales!

We can use calculus to maximise P. We differentiate with respect to the thing we can change, p, and we get this:

dP/dp = N-2ap+ac

We get a maximum when dP/dp=0, and that happens when p=(N+ac)/(2a). Substitute that back into the formula for total sales and we get

S=N-a(N+ac)/(2a)

Simplifying, S=(N-ac)/2.

Interestingly, this implies that, under this model, when your profit is maximised you have less than half the maximum possible market.


Contents

There were no headings
in the main text so there
is no table of contents.
 

Links on this page

 
Site hosted by Colin and Rachel Wright:
  • Maths, Design, Juggling, Computing,
  • Embroidery, Proof-reading,
  • and other clever stuff.

Suggest a change ( <-- What does this mean?) / Send me email
Front Page / All pages by date / Site overview / Top of page

Universally Browser Friendly     Quotation from
Tim Berners-Lee
    Valid HTML 3.2!