Miles Per Gallon 


My latest posts can be found here: Previous blog posts:
Additionally, some earlier writings: 
Miles per Gallon  2015/05/03I remember a while ago attending a talk that did something utterly bizarre with units of "miles per gallon." I don't remember much about it, but I thought I'd attempt to reconstruct the process in a post, just to see how far I get, what conclusion I reach, and whether people think it's as bonkers as I do. So here we go ... We start by talking about fuel consumption in a car. Let's suppose for the sake of concreteness that the car can get 30 miles per gallon. The following figures are rough, but close enough.
Now a litre of fluid is 0.001 m^{3}, or 10^{6} cubic millimetres. Thus our 30 miles per gallon is 10560 m per (10^{6} mm^{3}), which is the same as 10.56x10^{6} mm per (10^{6} cubic mm), or 10.56 mm / mm^{3}. Cancelling units, we get a result of 10.56 mm^{2}. Well, units of mm^{2} are a bit difficult to visualise, so we can invert this, and instead of talking about miles per gallon, we can talk about gallons per mile, and we discover that our car's fuel consumption is roughly 0.1 mm^{2}. (More accurately, 0.0942 mm^{2}) What? What this means is that if you had a trough with a crosssectional area of 0.1 mm^{2} and you filled it with fuel, and if your car could scoop up that fuel as it went, the fuel it collected would be enough to keep it going for as long as the trough was there supplying the fuel. Just 0.1 mm^{2}. That can't be right, can it? Yes, I think it is. Consider the figure of 30 miles per gallon. That's roughly 10 km per litre. Now imagine spreading that 1 litre into a cuboid that's square in crosssection, and 10 km long. What's the area of the crosssection? Yup, it's 0.1 mm^{2}. Intriguing. Added later:A few people have pointed out this link: It's typical that XKCD should get there and, as always, do such an outstanding job of it. In my defence, I saw the talk about units may years ago, perhaps as many as 25 years, and certainly before I knew of XKCD.
CommentsI've decided no longer to include comments directly via the Disqus (or any other) system. Instead, I'd be more than delighted to get emails from people who wish to make comments or engage in discussion. Comments will then be integrated into the page as and when they are appropriate. If the number of emails/comments gets too large to handle then I might return to a semiautomated system. That's looking increasingly unlikely.

Quotation from Tim BernersLee 