Editing NewtonsMethod
You are currently not logged in.
To change this, fill in the following fields:
Username
Password
Who can read this page?
The World
Members
Council
Admin
You have been granted an edit lock on this page
until Fri Apr 19 16:57:33 2024.
Press
to finish editing.
Who can edit this page?
World editing disabled
Members
Council
Admin
Also called the Newton-Raphson Method A way of finding solutions to equations /f(x)=0./ Different starting points give different answers, and some give no answers at all. Using complex numbers and plotting the basins of attraction on the complex plane can give fractals. Which is nice. ---- !! More details ... The first derivative of a function is its slope. That's how much it changes in value for small perturbations of the location. In other words, the derivative is defined so that this is true: * EQN:f(x+\epsilon){\approx}f(x)+{\epsilon}f'(x) So let's suppose we have EQN:x_0 and we want to move it a bit, say by EQN:\epsilon , to a location where the function evaluates to 0. So we want to find EQN:\epsilon such that * EQN:f(x_0+\epsilon)=0 In other words, we want to solve * EQN:0{\approx}f(x_0)+{\epsilon}f'(x_0) which is clearly * EQN:\epsilon\approx\frac{-f(x_0)}{f'(x_0)} So starting from EQN:x_0 we get EQN:x_1=x_0-\frac{f(x_0)}{f'(x_0)} Lather, rinse, repeat. This works in the complex plane with the complex numbers, as well as with the real numbers. Newton's method can be adapted for use on multidimensional problems: you have a function /f/ from /n/ dimensional space to /n/ dimensional space (equivalently: /n/ functions of /n/ variables); its derivative EQN:f'(x_0) (an /n/ by /n/ matrix, now) is defined in the same way as above; provided the matrix is invertible, we may then solve for EQN:\epsilon as before. If the initial estimate EQN:x_0 is too far from the actual root /x/ (so that EQN:\epsilon is not small and the approximation EQN:f(x+\epsilon){\approx}f(x)+{\epsilon}f'(x) isn't a good one) then Newton's method may misbehave, producing an updated estimate that's no better (or even worse) than the original one. As an alarming special case, consider what happens when /x/ is very close to a zero of EQN:f' .